View Single Post
Old 08-08-2020, 07:55 PM   #56708
Emperor Smeat
Former TPWW Royalty
 
Emperor Smeat's Avatar
 
Posts: 66,636
Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Emperor Smeat makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Nerfect View Post
Your explanation is a mess. So there are 3 people on a show Bayley isn’t even on that have a problem with her? That sounds like a lot, considering she isn’t even rostered onto that show.

It’s fucking fine. It’s hollow and uninteresting. But a “mess?” Holy shit. Chill the fuck out. If having a heel champ you need to sashay a new challenger in for is a “mess,” I can’t imagine how you would describe AEW’s women’s division.

Oh wait, it’s probably “brilliant” because Dave Meltzer says it is.
What's with you thinking everything I talk about wrestling comes from or is influenced by Meltzer.

That problem with Bayley is what Steph stated on SD last night as the reason for making the upcoming Battle Royal a three-brand match instead of just focusing on SD.

WWE's main roster women's division being a mess comes from actually watching these shows the past few months and seeing WWE wasting a golden opportunity to properly build up others lower on the ladder and improve the quality of their RAW and SD divisions.

AEW Women's division is just as poorly booked because of a mix of injuries and them not getting enough quality tv time to develop into a strong division after all these months.
Emperor Smeat is offline   Reply With Quote