Quote:
|
Originally Posted by The CyNick
You're wrong about Flair. If Flair were to leave the company today, business would be exactly the same, no better no worse. Flair is never put in a position to draw money, so its impossible to say he draws a little bit or a lot of money. Maybe if he was headlining you could say he's a draw, but he isn't so you cant say he is a draw (correctly anyway).
And you made my point by saying "who cares if he dances or not?" Thats the point right there. The WWE shouldn't care if he dances, as long as it gets a reaction why stop him from doing it? People are still going to boo him because he acts like an ass, carries around a poodle and waves a French flag. And again, just turn him baby if thats what the fans want.
|
You right that the WWE will do the exact same buisness that they would with or with out Flair... I'm just saying that Flair is a bigger name the Dupree. When you put it the way you did about how the WWE shouldn't care, I guess you got a point there, in a perfect world they should really back off and let the guys do there thing. From everything I've heard Dupree is an arrogant jerk backstage, and I think that maybe if the use this "control" of his character as a way of making him be a bit more humble backstage, it'll be a good thing. Kinda like they say, "If your going to be a jerk then were going to keep taking away certian rights. If you start being a better team player then you can have it back." It's a good way of using negitive re-enforcment. Like I said in an earlier post Dupree has a lot of promise but if he ends up being another glory hog pain in the ass, it's not worth it.
But all and all, you convinced me of what you were saying Cynick