Thread: Ratings Thread
View Single Post
Old 02-08-2021, 07:17 PM   #2627
xrodmuc316
CodeBot Engaged...WOAAHH!
 
xrodmuc316's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,766
xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ultra Mantis View Post
Where did I say the dictionary definition was wrong? You were quoting it to try and validate your own incorrect usage of the word and then you started trying to make a big play about fractions because you couldnt figure out any other way to try and demonstrate intelligence. You still don't understand where you went wrong and you're getting so hung up over this you're tying yourself in knots. Maybe start by grounding your arguments in reality and stop shitting in the resteraunt. Hey, and try adding an s onto the end of the word fanatic. I wonder what would happen?
You said I picked a few words that popped out.

I in fact selected 2 of the 3 full definitions.

You said picking a small fraction of the definition blah blah.

2 out of 3, or the fraction 2/3, is not a small fraction, it is the majority.

You said fanatic, not fanatics.

It is not my fault you do not understand plurals.

You do not understand dictionaries, reading, writing, or math.
xrodmuc316 is offline   Reply With Quote