Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan
Speculation and “They have already fucked up by doing this thing in the future” aren’t the same thing.
I’m not doing it for the sake of it. I’m doing it to prove the same point I’ve been trying to make to you (and Xrod before we became best friends) Even when you can just be right about saying “AEW is shit” and explaining why, you do a disservice to yourself when you do stuff like that.
|
That’s not what I said though. Don’t sling mud about twisting shit when you’ve got to do it to stick your point. I was clearly speculating. If they don’t do it, they fucked up the alleged plans. Just like WWE. If they do? Then it’s exactly what I’m speculating, and you know it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan
For all their faults, AEW has only put the title on their top stars at the time. To try to shit on them for doing that dumb WWE thing where they put the title on a midcarder to try to get him over when they’ve literally not done it once is a bad fucking case to make. You twist things in a weird way to shit on AEW when you don’t need to.
|
All moot since I was speculating on the alleged creative direction (someone above just posted about it). And, as I said, I would pick at straws when it comes to Omega. He’s a guy that banks on what he’s already done, like Jericho and Moxley, but I think you can have him either way. He’s a guy that a lot of people would only know from AEW, and how strong a main eventer he is in that context is up to your interpretation.
On one hand, he main evented a lot of PPVs and they told you he was this amazing wrestler; on the other they did expect putting the belt on him to signify some sort of radical change in him being this next level guy. Never mind he did cheat to win the belt too, so he’s not exactly
supposed to be seen on the level of a Moxley.
Am I wrong about any of that?