View Single Post
Old 07-19-2021, 01:14 PM   #5343
xrodmuc316
CodeBot Engaged...WOAAHH!
 
xrodmuc316's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,758
xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by #1-wwf-fan View Post
That was directed toward Xrod who seems to find it trivial and also necessary.
I never said it was necessary, I said it was trivial in my first post about it. My initial thinking was the 3rd tweet could be bothered by either the little lie or the needing to point out such a little lie, both of which were occurrences so small that they did not warrant such an angry tweet from the 3rd guy.

In this case you introduced the idea that the guy pointing out the technicality was only doing so to rally against AEW. I think he just did it because he wanted to point out something he knew.

Nothing in his post was bashing, or trying to disparage anything.

That said, a professional reporter should be corrected because he is a professional reporter, regardless of the subject matter.

I know that sounds the same as "necessary" in this specific case, but that is me making a blanket statement. If a reporter reports Joe Biden never ran for President until 2020, and somebody pointed out that he was in the 1988 Democratic primary, a 3rd tweet belittling the 2nd tweet as an anti Democrat/pro Republican would be just as absurd as getting mad at this guy pointing out Britt Baker's history.
xrodmuc316 is offline   Reply With Quote