Quote:
Originally Posted by BigCrippyZ
You literally commented on a photo of the main event that you called "stupid" with no context for it, and without ever watching much more than the first (at best) 10 minutes of the show according to your own commentary. Tell me, how that's objective, let alone constructive or productive? You obviously have the right to do it, but that doesn't mean you should or that it's somehow rational or intelligent, or that I'm not going to call out your stupid bullshit.
I don't fault you for not being able to watch the show live, and not even your negative comments. If I did, I'd equally shit on AAA's negative comments, especially when, for whatever reason, he can't watch it live. I'm not claiming that AEW is perfect or without fault or criticism. I don't always enjoy everything they do myself.
I fault you for your often shitty, unchallenged, after-the-fact, routine commentary. Even worse is that it's more often treated as superior by other morons who don't even bother watch the same show, despite the realities of your commentary's own faults or criticisms. It's at best pathetic analysis and/or a desperate attempt at cronyism.
|
Somehow this standard never extends to the WWE. Bet you’ve never formed an opinion off something you’ve heard you did or saw a photo of, right? It’s only AEW that gets this grace range where you’ve got to see all their output to have a reaction to it. And if you don’t like the product? Don’t watch. It’s not like criticism of the WWE hasn’t been welcome for 20+ years now.