Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lara Emily
Not saying that it isn't odd but don't forget the judge basically let the defence use her past sexual history as evidence if she took the stand that's all the defence would ask her about. She'd be destroyed because of her past sex life, which is and will always be completely irrelevant to whether a person was raped or not, that type of defence I thought had long been outlawed, sadly I was wrong.
|
Im sure if she was a virgin, the prosecution would have been shoving that down our throats.
She is a slut. She slept with him consensually with intent to claim rape and get money.
Her past sex life is relevant, especially if she had sex 48 hours before or after she did Koybe. If she had sex the day after the alledeged rape, that information is very relevant, and there is no way you could argue against that.
If she didnt want to be "destroyed" over her past sex life...perhaps she should have kept her legs closed more often.
Same with her medical history...if she has a past of disturbing things.
Can sluts and people with mental problems be raped...of course. But they are also more likely to lie about being rapped.