Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ]{lepto]{lown
Im sure if she was a virgin, the prosecution would have been shoving that down our throats.
She is a slut. She slept with him consensually with intent to claim rape and get money.
Her past sex life is relevant, especially if she had sex 48 hours before or after she did Koybe. If she had sex the day after the alledeged rape, that information is very relevant, and there is no way you could argue against that.
If she didnt want to be "destroyed" over her past sex life...perhaps she should have kept her legs closed more often.
Same with her medical history...if she has a past of disturbing things.
Can sluts and people with mental problems be raped...of course. But they are also more likely to lie about being rapped.
|
The thing is this opens flood gates. It creates an atmosphere where the victim ends up on trial, that's why these type of defences were banned in the first place. Look I'm not saying he's guilty, I'm just saying her sex life (or anyone's sex life in any rape case) should not be a valid defence.