Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Lara Emily
The thing is this opens flood gates. It creates an atmosphere where the victim ends up on trial, that's why these type of defences were banned in the first place. Look I'm not saying he's guilty, I'm just saying her sex life (or anyone's sex life in any rape case) should not be a valid defence.
|
Her sex life 2 years ago is irrelevant.
He sex life a week before and a week after the alledged rape is very relevant.
If she had multiple sex partners during that time, its possible any damage was done by someone else.
That is whats relevant. Anyone trying to argue that obviously doesnt care about the truth.