Thread: WWE Day 1 - 1.1.22
View Single Post
Old 01-02-2022, 05:06 PM   #3
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lock Jaw View Post
Somehow from his opinions, I get the impression that he is not going to accept a bet whose outcome relies on what the "sheetz" say.
And how is it going to be measured? By Smeat’s opinion. All I’m saying is that there’s intentionality behind this decision. They didn’t have to put Brock in the WWE Title match. They chose to. So if Brock goes into Mania as champion…do I win? What about if he defends the belt on Raw sometime and loses it back to Big E? Do I win then? Or is Smeat going to fold his arms and say “See! I didn’t like this so therefore it was short-sighted”?

Would he make the same bet about Becky and Bianca? I think the plan is for Bianca to take the belt off Becky at Mania. So is that long-term planning that started at SummerSlam? Or is Smeat going to count that as a “WWE Bad” moment?

My issue with him is his credulity and tendency to just believe this rhetoric. I don’t trust him to have any sort of objective standard in place.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote