View Single Post
Old 03-26-2022, 01:06 PM   #8543
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,393
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by XL View Post
The conversation spun out from a comment about AEW being able to make stars and WWE being incapable of doing so. With that pretense I think it’s important that we established what we were talking about when discussing what a star is. Besides, there was no discussion on the semantics; you set the definition that we were working with. Then offered examples (baring in mind you could have used anyone on WWE’s roster as an example) that didn’t meet the definition.
I don’t know how to keep this going with you. I am not being an asshole, I just genuinely don’t. I will just say it again: I think Austin Theory is a bigger star than Adam Page. Because being in the WWE means you are getting more exposure. Being prominent there means you’re going to be more famous than someone in AEW.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote