Thread: Monday Night (white)RABBIT - 9/26/22
View Single Post
Old 09-26-2022, 11:42 PM   #59
xrodmuc316
CodeBot Engaged...WOAAHH!
 
xrodmuc316's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,815
xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Nerfect View Post
Not necessarily. WWE could just claim that the teasers weren’t for anyone specific and/or they changed direction when Black became available. Them using those lyrics doesn’t necessarily mean anything either. WWE presumably owns the theme song. They could use the lyrics in there even if Black was still under AEW contract and just give his theme to someone else. Plus, we don’t know when Malakai Black was actually released. It’s possible it was negotiated some time ago and he’s free to go back to WWE whenever (unlikely, but possible).

I’m not sure I believe that story though lol. That’s too “discrete” for WWE. Their style is more on-the-nose stuff.
Yeah, I read that unlike the DIABOLICAL WWE having illegal 90 day no-compete clauses in their contract, that AEW and Tiny really respect and treat their wrestlers better, and they only have 180 day no-compete clauses in their contracts.

Wait, 90 days is longer and more unfair than 180 days, right?
xrodmuc316 is offline   Reply With Quote