View Single Post
Old 05-28-2023, 02:59 AM   #2
xrodmuc316
CodeBot Engaged...WOAAHH!
 
xrodmuc316's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,794
xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darlene View Post
That's been the case since Lynch won the Smackdown and RAW Women's titles. Throughout his reign as uWu champion, Roman Reigns has been recognized as both the WWE and Universal Champion. Same goes for the Usos and KO / Sami for the tag belts.
Becky's was a bit different in that she still had individual defenses of each title, but you are right. WWE just has no consistent logic. If a third World Title was necessary, shouldn't a third set of Tag Titles be necessary? If Roman's 2 titles are Smackdown exclusive, why can K.O. and Sami go between shows. If the Women's tag titles had to be vacated, why are they ignoring the NXT Women's tag champions, who are exclusive to Smackdown.

It is WWE's randomness of sticking to their own logic and rules that is absolutely ridiculous lol
xrodmuc316 is offline   Reply With Quote