Thread: Rate the Game: Week 138
View Single Post
Old 06-28-2023, 10:44 PM   #13
M-A-G
Higher. Further. Faster.
 
M-A-G's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,184
M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)M-A-G makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
This post is sponsored by the Kraken
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClockShot View Post
Gave it a 3 because the first game was solid and EA probably had a new franchise on their hands.

The subsequent sequels however were rather bad. And that's why this series has been sent to the graveyard.
Quote:
Originally Posted by drave View Post
It was good man, even solo. One person "gets aggro" while the other mows down the lot. Had to switch off aggro modes, and I think there was even an aggro meter? When it was full you'd go "back to back" in a slo-mo view and PEW PEW PEW PEW PEW!!!!

It was great.
So just on the basis of the first game, you think it deserved a franchise?
M-A-G is offline   Reply With Quote