View Single Post
Old 12-16-2024, 03:08 PM   #16102
xrodmuc316
CodeBot Engaged...WOAAHH!
 
xrodmuc316's Avatar
 
Posts: 9,807
xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)xrodmuc316 makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Rogerer View Post
Why? Confused by this, what should people be using?
Mostly because Dave's important metrics change every week so no matter what, it means AEW is doing great. 18-49 only matters when AEW wins, otherwise he spins it. Let's not forget when Dave explained how in Canada, the demo is 18-54, and AEW won that demo, because Canadian ratings let Dave hype up how great AEW was doing that week.

When NXT got 680,000 viewers with a .17 demo, and Dynamite got 573,000 viewers with a .17 demo, Dave declared that AEW won, because .17 in the demo on TBS is better than .17 on the CW.

Nevermind that 107,000 less people watched, or that AEW's payroll is easily 20 times of what NXT's payroll is, or that CW is paying NXT 5 times less than WBD is paying AEW. But none of those points allow Dave to spin that a .17 demo is better than a .17 demo, which defeats Dave's purpose of covering for AEW's failure to grow their brand whatsoever.

Last edited by xrodmuc316; 12-16-2024 at 03:13 PM.
xrodmuc316 is offline   Reply With Quote