Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Helmsphere
okay, I guess it's my turn to finally be able to do some talking...
As for the people complaining, that Regal's and Storms shouldn't be in the top 10, because they haven't had any classic matches...
Well it's True, They haven't, however, that doesn't nessecary, make them lower ranked...yes they didn't have the huge push and overness, because they were never really given that chance...Sid, did have the overness, because he was pushed and he was in Classic Matches...only because he was pushed and the Talent, they was carrying him thru the matches...You always talk about how HBk and Sid is a Classic, It wouldn't be shit if it wasn't for HBK, making Sid look like gold, instead of like the piece of shit that he is.
Just because Storm and Regal haven't had classic matches doesn't make them worse then Sid...Because with Sid...It's 2 matches....surrounded by 150 Shitty Matches, while with Storm and Regal, you may not have Classic Matches, but you still have 152 good matches, because they are talented, unlike the former.
If Regal and Storm were given the Push that Sid was given, as well as the chances to have as good of matches as they want with HBK at the PPV, they would make the Sid v. HBK match, look like nothing
|
So basically you judging Storm and Regal by a bunch of IF's. If they got push,etc. Since they never got push, why give them high scores? How can Booker not be in the top 10 and he had classic matches,great interviews and tons of good matches but yet Regal and Storm is in the top 10. Even Hogan is not in the top 10 and he had classic matches,alot of good matches,great promos and fueds and is the most popular wrestler ever. Do you people really think Regal and Storm is better than Hogan? No but since politics is the only thing you think about, Hogan gets screw. I think HHH did'nt make the top 10 either(not sure).
Why is Ted Dibiase and Owen is above Austin and Sting? Can anybody give me an argument why Dibiase and Owen is better than Austin and Sting?