TPWW Forums - View Single Post

**Mister Sinister** · 10-28-2004, 07:30 PM

No...What I was saying was....You came Sid is so much better then Storm and Regal...and he defiantly has the Edge in Overness, and you're right he does have the Edge in classic matches....however...Sid hardly ever has a good match...

Okay....v. HBK was good, but mostly because HBK carried him thru the entire match, should Sid be consider a God in the ring, because Michaels carried him and made him look like gold?

Wargames....Well it's hard to judge Sid on Wargames, because if I'm not mistaken, 7 other guys were in the ring with him...Plus, was Sid perfomance that electricflying? I doubt it....Plus mostly, all the Wargames matches are considered Classic, because the IDEA and the hype is great....You saying Wargames was a great Sid match....is like saying, Wargames 98, was a great Stevie Ray & Warrior Match.

Okay, now that you got his supposely classic matches out of the war, what do you have left?Undertaker v. Sid for the belt? That can hardly be consider great....Yes the Buildup for Taker winning the belt was great, but the match itself wasn't....The only thing great, well not really great but unusual that perheps makes the match stand out....is Sid shitted his panties

But all thoses matches you consider Classic, are only Classic, for the fact that they had great buildup, and were told well, not because they were wrestle well...and Sid can hardly be given the Credit for them.

Now, I'm not judging Storm and Regal....and let me just say this, without anyone getting made at me....it's my opinion and just that...a Opinion, but I like Storm alot more then Regal.

I'm just was saying, the only reason, they haven't had Classic Matches, was because they're never been pushed and put in a situlation to...Mostly because they aren't over 6'6" and Near 300 lbs, Or because they had some over the top Character....Plus they are Wrestlers....To say they suck, because they haven't had classic matches unlike Sid and should automatically, be ranked lower then him because of that, it sorta bias...but I can see why you would say that....however most of the people on the boards....which would be mostly, the Majority of the forums....Perheps Talent over Character....which is why, you see, people who can wrestle with the best of them and why, Guy's like Sid, Nash and Bradshaw get lower scores...

But all in all? Why Complain about who is ranked higher? I mean...It's not like it's going to be posted by Vince McMahon and listed as the Officiall List of The Top 100 Wrestlers ever....It's all just opinion...

And Because it's Opinions of about 250 different people....it's going to be altered from yours.

10-28-2004, 07:30 PM	#101
Mister Sinister Less Talk, More Rokk! Posts: 3,555	No...What I was saying was....You came Sid is so much better then Storm and Regal...and he defiantly has the Edge in Overness, and you're right he does have the Edge in classic matches....however...Sid hardly ever has a good match... Okay....v. HBK was good, but mostly because HBK carried him thru the entire match, should Sid be consider a God in the ring, because Michaels carried him and made him look like gold? Wargames....Well it's hard to judge Sid on Wargames, because if I'm not mistaken, 7 other guys were in the ring with him...Plus, was Sid perfomance that electricflying? I doubt it....Plus mostly, all the Wargames matches are considered Classic, because the IDEA and the hype is great....You saying Wargames was a great Sid match....is like saying, Wargames 98, was a great Stevie Ray & Warrior Match. Okay, now that you got his supposely classic matches out of the war, what do you have left?Undertaker v. Sid for the belt? That can hardly be consider great....Yes the Buildup for Taker winning the belt was great, but the match itself wasn't....The only thing great, well not really great but unusual that perheps makes the match stand out....is Sid shitted his panties But all thoses matches you consider Classic, are only Classic, for the fact that they had great buildup, and were told well, not because they were wrestle well...and Sid can hardly be given the Credit for them. Now, I'm not judging Storm and Regal....and let me just say this, without anyone getting made at me....it's my opinion and just that...a Opinion, but I like Storm alot more then Regal. I'm just was saying, the only reason, they haven't had Classic Matches, was because they're never been pushed and put in a situlation to...Mostly because they aren't over 6'6" and Near 300 lbs, Or because they had some over the top Character....Plus they are Wrestlers....To say they suck, because they haven't had classic matches unlike Sid and should automatically, be ranked lower then him because of that, it sorta bias...but I can see why you would say that....however most of the people on the boards....which would be mostly, the Majority of the forums....Perheps Talent over Character....which is why, you see, people who can wrestle with the best of them and why, Guy's like Sid, Nash and Bradshaw get lower scores... But all in all? Why Complain about who is ranked higher? I mean...It's not like it's going to be posted by Vince McMahon and listed as the Officiall List of The Top 100 Wrestlers ever....It's all just opinion... And Because it's Opinions of about 250 different people....it's going to be altered from yours.