|
I consider the WWE Title the old WWF title. I see it as it was many years ago, just the WWE/F world title. No WCW/NWA/Undisputed lineage, to me its the WWE/F title I grew up watching.
For some reason, I consider the World Heavyweight title as just the main title on Raw. I dont feel it has history, or it is even a "World" title. I see it as Raw's main title, but not a World title.
The United States title is a funny one, as much as I want to think of it as the old WCW US title, reincarnated in the WWE, I just cant. I'm not really sure what to think about it at the moment, other than its the mid-card/upper mid-card title.
Much like the WWE title, I view the Intercontinental as it has always been since Pat Patterson won it lightyears ago. I had forgotten up until a second ago that the Hardcore and European title were merged with it.
The tag team titles are a tough one, I just see them as each brands Tag titles.
Cruiserweight title is a joke compared to WCW's version. If they were going to have a belt for the cruiserweights then they should go about an do it properly and have different competing for it rather than just the usual cycle of guys they currently have.
Womens title......I had forgotten who the champ was until Taboo Tuesday. That pretty much tells you what I think of it.
|