Thread: Title Discussion Thread
View Single Post
Old 10-31-2004, 05:20 PM   #30
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gohan3k
wtf, it's in the history books that Kane won it, thats' ALL that matters, and austin had to give all of his options, he even said "these are all your choices"

if you want to consider it a new title go ahead, but the WWE obviously considers it the WCW title, i dont' wanna debate anymore.
You don't have to, and my point was that Stone Cold Steve Austin never considers the fact that Kane should be counted as a champion. Would you count him as a champion if he stole it from you, and then the ngith after you got it back? Austin may even consider it just one interrupted reign. That isn't correct.

And the title CAN'T be the WCW Title. Triple H hasn't won it nine times.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote