Quote:
Originally Posted by darkpower
You do have a point that it may take a long time for all the exact numbers and stats to be figured out, and that the WWE should (and probably had every intentions to) pay on it. But that is still something that the WWF should've done before the very first lawsuit was filed, not now. Even at that point, they could've gotten a pretty good estimated figure of damages they claimed came from the WWE (and there is also a small possibility of whether or not the damages were intentional or not being a factor, don't ask me how, though I doubt it, but I will never be able to fully understand some judges anymore). And coupled with the fact that there have been lawsuits before this and after the first one, there are many suspicions that cloud this issue.
I do thank you, though, for making this a debate rather than just saying that someone sucked for disagreeing. I still can't see why this could've been done sooner. It does no good to wait this long for the WWF.
|
You bring up a good point as well, and it really wouldn't surprise me if someone in the WWF said "Hey, we need a truck full of cash, fast!", and then someone said "Hey, let's sue the WWE again for damages down to our organisation!". Timing may be something that couldn't have been helped here by the Fund, or it could just be the time the Fund decides they want a bit of extra cash (that they are intitled to).
I guess the legal facts will come up in court, so I guess we can just hope that the World Wildlife Fund is more than fair in their asking price, and that the ruling is more than fair itself.