Thread: Title Discussion Thread
View Single Post
Old 11-06-2004, 10:01 PM   #48
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gohan3k
but WWE writes the wrestling history, so WWE's point of view is the historic point of view, isn't it?

and alenoid, how many times have you said the same things over and over -_-

i know what happend, i did watch wrestling back then, but bischoff did have rights to the undisputed champion, it's just steph payed brock a lot to not appear on raw (he was still under both raw and smackdown contracts.. she didn't "sign" him to smackdown) so he could have just taken half of brock's title away, he did have the power to do so, and it was at this point that they started calling brock's title the WWE title, not the undisputed title. If it's not up to the WWE to decide if that has the lineage of the WCW title, who's right is it? If it's not WWE's choice then all it can be at most is a matter of opinion, i'll admit there's good arguments on both sides.. but WWE says the world title has the lineage of the WCW title, and personally that's how i look at it.

I agree with you, the WWE does control the titles, but they can't change the past, and they blended the titles together. If they had used any other belt, we probably wouldn't be having this arguement. We probably will never know for sure, but the WWE hasn't really stated either way.

I like to think that if Bischoff was in control of both titles, he would have of made a match for Triple H vs. Lesnar or something, and when Brock didn't show up, he could announce Triple H was the winner via forfeit. I think of the World Heavyweight Title like this:

There are two horse stables. One is the RAW stable, the other is the SmackDown! stable. Now for the last 10 years, there have been two horses that are really impressive. A red horse, and a blue horse. Now, the people who own the RAW & SmackDown! stables buy this red horse (they own the blue horse already) and they breed it with the blue horse ( ), which makes a purple horse. Now the blue and red horse are older now, and they can't run. But the purple horse is a mixture of them, and carries on the blue & red heritage.

Now the people in the SmackDown! stable get greedy, and decide to keep the purple horse for themselves, so the RAW people buy a yellow horse, but paint him red, so he looks exactly like the red horse that was famous all those years ago.

The horses look the same, are the same rare colour and can both run really fast. But they aren't the same horse, as much as they advertise the new red horse as "the red horse", the original red horse is retired and its work carries on in its child, the purple horse. There is no way to "undo" the red & blue horse's relations, and there is no way to remove the red horse's DNA for the pruple horse

Red Horse= WCW Championship
Blue Horse= WWE Championship
Purple Horse= Undisputed Championship
Yellow Horse= World Heavyweight Championship
Horses Breeding=
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote