Thread: PART 2 - Do you agree or disagree with the following Smackdown/TNA paragraph?
View Single Post
Old 11-25-2004, 09:57 PM   #2
The CyNick
Make the IWC Great Again
 
The CyNick's Avatar
 
Posts: 8,922
The CyNick is good (20,000+)The CyNick is good (20,000+)The CyNick is good (20,000+)The CyNick is good (20,000+)The CyNick is good (20,000+)The CyNick is good (20,000+)The CyNick is good (20,000+)The CyNick is good (20,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heyman
PART 2 - Do you agree or disagree with the following Smackdown/TNA paragraph?


Probably an unrealistic and (stupid?) idea on my part
Only thing I agree with on this post

I didn't hear the numbers for the TV tapings, but RAW's last PPV did like 3,000 people for attendance or something like that. So RAW is in just as bad of shape as SD is.

Plus, SD has had their highest ratings of the year last week, so its not all doom and gloom for them.

Its true that WWE will always favour RAW, but saying they should sell it to TNA is just, well stupid like you said.

When you guys talk about competition being "good" for Vince, you obviously dont understand business. Vince doesn't want competition, why would he? He would lose money if he lost SD. No matter how low their live attendance gets, as long as you hear Tazz going "Smackdown is brought to you by *insert random sponsor here*" the WWE is making money. Why the WWE would sell that is beyond my comprehension.
The CyNick is offline   Reply With Quote