[Loose Cannon]

Originally Posted by Alienoid06 But the Hart name wasn't even used to promote the book. How does putting the name "Hart" in the book make Flair money when it is only something you discover AFTER you've made a transaction for the book? Bret shouldn't sugar coat his issues with people, but syaing "he's a five out of ten wrestler" is pathetic. How is that anymore honourable than what Flair did? Flair's best match against Bret's worst match? I haven't seen many of either guys, but I'm pretty sure Bret's worst match (and I'm sure he's had his share of barely watchable's, no matter how rare they are) would not compare to the "masterpieces" of Ric Flair. Ric Flair vs. Ricky "The Dragon" Steamboat in NWA ranks among the best matches of all time in a lot of people's books, and Hart says its got nothing on his worst match? That is a HUGE lie, IMO. In this world, you don't need to say bad things about other people at all. Flair can say what he wants, but Hart responding makes him look like an old dog/little child. Flair's got his opinion, and he's entitled to give it. You mentioned why Flair had to mention the Bret/Owen situation? Because it was a piece of info Flair had yet to be revealed to the world. How is Flair speaking his mind any different from Hart speaking his? I have respect for both men, and both are uncomparible in the world of Sports and Entertainment. Flair didn't "start anything" with Hart, Flair wrote a piece of information that he is allowed to comment on in his book. Hart took it to the next level. You can't have a game of tennis without a person to hit the ball back. Hart just should of let Flair have his game of squash and let it go, IMO.

I'll say this. You do know that Ric Flair told Bret right to his face in 92 that Bret vs Bulldog at Wembley Stadium in 1992 was the greatest match he's ever seen right?