Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Kane Knight
Yeah, heaven forbid people actually criticise a sloppy performance. It's not like people are getting paid to put on a professional show.
Nobody demanded an overturning of the "ruling," and nobody argued that Cynick's governing body get involved. Isn't it just slightly possible that this was brought up because of poor execution, and not because some fanboy wants to expose wrestling as fake?
|
But its a stupid thing to bring up.
Its clear what they were trying to do, even if it was off half a second, or God forbid a FULL second, why do people have to make a big point of it?
It would be like going to a live theatre production and going "that guy who played Hamlet was 3/8 of an inch too far to the left when he delivered his last line".
There are far more important things to criticize the WWE for.