View Single Post
Old 12-12-2004, 10:49 PM   #22
Mister Sinister
Less Talk, More Rokk!
 
Mister Sinister's Avatar
 
Posts: 3,555
Mister Sinister has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Mister Sinister has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Mister Sinister has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Mister Sinister has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Mister Sinister has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Mister Sinister has a great deal of rep (15,000+)Mister Sinister has a great deal of rep (15,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by KingofOldSchool
It's called debating...I thought this is what this whole "Rate the Wrestler" thing is all about, yeah?
Not Really...by the way, this is my last reply in this topic, so Funky doesn't have to sort thru tons of posts to try to grade theses things...

The whole purpoise of this thing, is to let everyone voice there opinions, on certein wrestlers...however, I respect your opinions, as far as your liking of wrestlers...and yes, at times, I do see things, being fucked up, as in...Hulk Hogan, regardless of how untalented he was....getting in the low 80's despite being the most over wrestler to ever be graced in our presences, another example, is Ric Flair, who is a well above average wrestler, and a legend, getting beat, by a kid who has a ton of potential, and the ultimate ammount of Talent in A.J Styles....If everyone actually graded things the same way...I would welcome debate, but everyone does indeed have there own opinions, on what they think is gold, because remember, while you may Hate Hardcore Wrestling...there are other who love, and Vice Versa....I mean, some People, love wrestlers who are High Flyers (Myself) Some love Characters (BigDaddyCool) and some just based things on Archivements in the ring....You by all means, welcome to open up your own thread to debate about each wrestler, I just would like to see the RTW Threads, clear of it....
Mister Sinister is offline