Thread: DISCUSSION - Could a 2.5 hour show work for RAW/Smackdown? (roster re-unification)
View Single Post
Old 12-13-2004, 12:03 PM   #9
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heyman
-No wrestler gets a significant loss of TV time.
-Matches are shorter and more "result" oriented (smarks will hate it, but the marks will love it. Marks compose of 90-95% of the fanbase anyways).
It's nice in theory, but do you thin kthat they'd reallystick to the formula?

We'd get an extra hour of JBL/HHH a week total, and we'd end up with as few superstars featured.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote