Thread: DISCUSSION - Do you agree with the WWE's handling of the "Brock Lesnar" situation?
View Single Post
Old 12-20-2004, 11:35 PM   #3
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innovator
I'd say A, but not with open arms. The way he left the company shouldn't be remembered, but it'd be idiotic to have him JOBout when he returns. He's a main eventer, and much needed over on Smackdown!
The question is though, would you "punish" him? (since you indicated that you would not bring him back with "open arms").

If the WWE are hell bent on punishing Lesnar, then I say have him MISS Wrestlemania, and debut the day after.

The absolute WORST fucking thing that they could do, is have him job and put him in the mid-cards. That would kill ANY potential of him drawing in the future.

Depending on which show Lesnar goes to, I'd have Cena or Orton turn heel (citing jealousy reasons). Both Cena and Orton are better as heels anyways (IMO). Of course - you'd have to see how the fans react though. If the fans turn on Lesnar, then the heel turn for Orton/Cena (due to Lesnar's arrival) should not happen.
Heyman is offline   Reply With Quote