Thread: DISCUSSION - Do you agree with the WWE's handling of the "Brock Lesnar" situation?
View Single Post
Old 12-21-2004, 01:57 AM   #17
Gouda
It's Hammer Time
 
Gouda's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,207
Gouda has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Gouda has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Gouda has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Gouda has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Gouda has a good deal of rep (10,000+)Gouda has a good deal of rep (10,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heyman
I know many will disagree with this, but I'd much rather see Lesnar go to RAW. Smackdown would get compensation obviously.

After WM, I'm intrigued with the idea of having Lesnar go to RAW straight up for Triple H.
Oh, if it's with compensation then I agree Lesnar would be better on Raw since you'd get to see new stuff.

However, knowing the WWE, if they put him on RAW, Smackdown would not get any compensation at all. Really, he's technically not part of the Smackdown roster anymore so they have no reason to compensate Smackdown if he shows up on Raw.
Gouda is offline   Reply With Quote