Thread: DISCUSSION - Do you agree with the WWE's handling of the "Brock Lesnar" situation?
View Single Post
Old 12-21-2004, 10:40 PM   #24
Heyman
Father of Hinduship
 
Heyman's Avatar
 
Posts: 21,083
Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Heyman makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corkscrewed
Frankly, I don't think they should bring him back at all, given his behavior.
Really?

Even though Lesnar can contribute to making RAW or Smackdown a better show? Even though Lesnar could potentially increase ratings? (he's one of the few bonafide main-eventers left in the world today who ISN"T passed his prime/retired......or isn't too green).

The Rock left the WWE for another career in Hollywood. The Rock's departure from the WWE has had a negative impact on ratings (one can argue).

Steve Austin left the WWE in 2002 (just walked right out).

If the WWE can pardon The Rock and Austin, then why can't they do the same to Lesnar?
Heyman is offline   Reply With Quote