Thread: HBK:The Greatest WWE legend ever?
View Single Post
Old 01-03-2005, 02:00 AM   #48
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,536
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nowhere Man
Just wondering, Alienoid, what exactly are the other needed criteria besides workrate and talent in order to be a legend?
None, I said Hart is a legend, but he's not the greatest ever. You can't exactly measure somebody by who's better technical-ability wise anyway. A lot of people think Bret is the best wrestler ever, but some people will argue Angle over him. Guys like Hogan and Austin are single-handedly responsible for increasing wrestling's popularity. These two will get my vote for greatest ever (Austin takes first place, because he was the better wrestler, IMO), while Hart, Angle, Michaels, Benoit, etc. will go down as legends, in my book, but they'll be only honourable mentions next to Hogan and Austin.
Mr. Nerfect is online now   Reply With Quote