View Single Post
Old 01-15-2005, 09:08 PM   #32
Mr. Nerfect
 
Posts: 61,634
Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Mr. Nerfect makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by The CyNick
Okay, but then Eddie, JBL, Cena and Booker T are all in higher spots because they've been on SD. It has nothing to do with anyone on SD, it just has to do with the fact they recieved bigger pusshes.

Same thing with the guys you mentioned from RAW. The fact that they are in higher positions, has little to do with HHH, it just has to do with the fact that they were pushed.

And none of those guys do numbers, so obviously getting a "rub" from HHH means nothing. Especially when HHH is a terrible draw himself. So there's nothing backing up what you're saying. You just seem to be drinking the HHH kool-aid that he's the "best in the business" and beating him actually means something, when there's no evidence to proves thats the case.
That's true, there is no evidence, because Triple H has yet to throw everything into a match, and walk out with nothing except his legacy.

He's "lost" to Benoit and Benjamin, but it didn't feel like a "big" loss. If Benoit had gone over Triple H one on one at Mania, then I think things would be very different right now.
Mr. Nerfect is offline   Reply With Quote