View Single Post
Old 01-24-2005, 07:55 PM   #4
addy2hotty
yes. yes. yes.
 
addy2hotty's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,753
addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)addy2hotty has a great deal of rep (15,000+)
I'm guessing WM will be 5 hours long again this year? Problem withs Rock's appearance last year was the lack of any real 'care' about it. More people wanted to see Foley - Orton, in my eyes Rock's involvement was all a bit pointless. A bit like Austin refereeing Goldberg - Lesnar, although they actually built that story up.

Rock vs Sting doesn't grab me at all tbh, and quite frankly The Rock being there at all in anything more than a speaking role wouldn't have any meaning or point whatsoever.

One thing I don't understand about this years WM, is that they are acting as if this is the 'big' one. Talking about Flair vs Steamboat, and now Rock vs Sting. Why can't they stick to the format of probably the most successful - WM17 and have (virtually) all of the matches mean something and in addition have a gimmicky match, I'd know I'd love to see something like an ECW Battle Royal for the ECW Heavyweight Championship, you don't have to sign the wrestlers, just have them for one night - like they did with the gimmick battle royal. It'd certainly get me tuning in, and would without a doubt be the highlight of the night. And if they are serious about an ECW PPV, it'd raise the expectations for that as well.
addy2hotty is offline   Reply With Quote