Well I guess its just me, but I consider all-star selections, playoff appearances, and team chemistry a better determination of league experience then age
OK, so Nash has a history of slowing down on the Mavs, but the Sonics have a history of what exactly? They came out of nowhere with hardly any established players based on anything except age, the Suns have players who are established as good, which is why they will finish with a better record then the Sonics. Good attempt to belittle me, but you'll have to have a little more then the teams average age (uncited mind you) and calling me gay to get a point across.