Quote:
|
Originally Posted by ThugLife
Hmm i havent read the second page yet but heyman no offence, but im kinda tired of the logic that as soon as someone gets boring they should go to smackdown.Thats degrading SD!, your saying basically that you should take away someone whos over on smackdown(e.g. cena or Eddie) and put him on Raw and then replace him with someone who isnt over. So by that logic, smackdown gets the boring wrestlers, while Raw gets the stars.
And then we would complain that Smackdown sucks even more.
|
I see what you're saying and to some degree, I guess that's true. I do tend to follow RAW a lot more, and so I'm a little biased as result.
Nonetheless - I do think a HEEL Randy Orton would be enough to compensate the loss of a FACE Eddie Guerrero......especially when you consider the potential of an Orton/Cena feud.
As far as the WWE is concerned, it seems like they themselves are a company who sends "boring" or "buried" wrestlers to SD, while sending the promising ones to RAW.
Last year for instance - we see Matt Hardy, Chris Benoit, Edge, Benjamin, etc. all get sent to RAW......all of which have (or had) tremendous upside.
Among the ones going to SD, were RVD, Booker T, and the Dudleys.......all of which who have been buried to death, or are stale as hell.
Nevermind what I feel, it seems like the WWE themselves are far more biased towards RAW......their flagship station.
With that in mind, I don't think its too farfetched to assume that the WWE would send Orton (a currently stale character) to Smackdown, for a guy like Cena or Guerrero.