View Single Post
Old 02-07-2005, 01:23 AM   #26
Fox
"Ask him!"
 
Fox's Avatar
 
Posts: 10,075
Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)Fox has a relatively large amount of rep (50,000+)
I caught TNA Impact last night and I have to say that I was not impressed.

The wrestling is good, I'll give them that. AJ Styles is probably one of the best wrestlers in the world today, and I really enjoyed his match (although I can't remember who it was against). The problem I see is simply their production values.

WCW NEVER looked that bad. They may have come from studio-beginnings as well, but it was never as bad as what TNA currently looks like. The backstage segments are terrible: poor acting, poor sound, bad camera-work, and terrible lighting. ECW's production values were better.

TNA can get big if they get over a few things:

1 - Jeff Jarrett as the star of the show
2 - Dusty Rhodes (I cannot stand this asshole, and I don't think much of middle-America, who does NOT know about his history in the business, would stand him either)
3 - The six sided ring
4 - Bad production values
5 - National exposure (better timeslot, better station, etc)

They have what it takes, there's just a few major changes that need to be made.
Fox is offline   Reply With Quote