Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BCWWF
A. Are you trying to say that Burress is faster then Moss?
B. Are you trying to say that Burress is better then Moss?
C. Are you aware that Moss was injured over half the season?
D. Are you aware that before Moss's injury, Duante, not Manning, was the front runner to break Marino's record, and everybody knows that Harrison-Wayne-Stokley > Moss-Burleson-Robinson
Just because Moss has some off field problems doesn't mean that he doesn't perform on the field. Burress is good, but he is no Moss, TO, or Harrison, and when you are on the level of those three you can affect a game A LOT
|
Really, must be difficult to type w/ moss dick in your mouth.
I've never said he wasn't a good player, I consider him one of the top 5 WR in the league.
But you seem to feel if Minnesota lost him the whole team would fall apart, and thats not even close.
Especially, if they signed Burress.
Is he faster then Moss? Dunno, what's Moss's 40-time now? I know in "high school" he was clocked at a 4.25-40, but what's he run now after his injuries?
This had nothing to do with who is better Moss or Burress, it's a simple fact that Burress is a top 5 WR and if the Vikes delt Moss and signed Burress they wouldn't drop much at the WR position, if anything. They would also have whatever they get for Moss. It's really a no brainer if they can pull off both.