Thread: NFL Draft 2005
View Single Post
Old 02-12-2005, 09:03 PM   #52
BCWWF
The People's Member
 
Posts: 18,092
BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)BCWWF is good (20,000+)
I never said that the Vikings would fall apart with Burress instead of Moss, they would still have a good offense, but Moss changes a game like only very few wide recievers do. I just don't agree that Moss's off field problems have affected him on the field, at least in the last year or two...

The original discussion has gone off track though, it was originally about Culpeppers #'s. Personally, I think that he would still be a good passer with Burress, but with Moss he is better. I overstated when I said 1/2 his stats, obviously I wasn't being serious though, but I understand that I have gone a little extreme in these two threads. I just think a Moss, TO, Marvin does something that no other WR's really do.
BCWWF is offline