Thread: The Snitsky/Heidenreich Conundrum
View Single Post
Old 02-17-2005, 10:44 AM   #19
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by snakeboss
I think the reason the wwe let Snitsky win and Heidenreich lose, is because...
1. Undertaker's more important to Smackdown than Kane is to Raw and if Undertaker lost to a newbie it would hurt Smackdown and his career.
2. Kane needed time off to film a movie so they used Snitsky as an excuse.
3. Undertaker's better than Kane, so he has a better reputation and has more chances of winning.
1. Undertaker's not important to Smackdown. Hell, half the time he doesn't even show up tro promote his PPV appearances.

2. Valid, yet doesn't explain his current sitch.

3. Yes, a redneck boxer who can barely lift up his opponents for his finisher is better. I agree. Kevin Nash is also better, because hasbeens=rulz
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote