|
The arguments overlap heavily, as the stances are not mutually exclusive. The problem is that in entertainment, ethics and business can easily go hand in hand. People with shit work ethics are usually bad for business, where as people with good work ethics are good for business.
Austin kept taking. Bad for business, bad for ethics and good will. Austin leaving over this was done poorly, and was bad ethically and bad for business. He didn't do his job, and he was on a far worse ethical AND business stance than brock was.
Kayfabe's argument revolves around who owes who, which is moot, because this IS a business. When someone walks into a store and you sell them something, you don't go "okay, but you owe me." You're not doing someone a favor by obeying management and store policy. And yet, even if this retarded point wasn't totally raped by then, Ausitn's not sitting pretty, yet he seems to hero worship the guy.
|