Thread: JBL Reaches Milestone - 2nd Longest Reign As WWE Champion
View Single Post
Old 02-20-2005, 09:52 PM   #39
#1-norm-fan
Resident drug enabler
 
#1-norm-fan's Avatar
 
Posts: 45,473
#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)#1-norm-fan makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Well I would judge his title reign based soley on quality of title defenses and how much credibility was brought to the title during his reing.

Howvever, The ratings during Bret's run didn't change at all during Michael's 8 months. He was the fan favorite going into WM 12 based on crowd reaction alone.

So again, if you're going to be fair and use the same principles to judge all title reigns, then Bret's wasn't good either and, if anything, was worse than Michael's.
#1-norm-fan is offline   Reply With Quote