Thread: I know this will spark a lot of shit...
View Single Post
Old 02-28-2005, 12:29 AM   #8
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by tucsonspeed6
I always assumed that the Fund was tired of getting embarrassed by being associated with the "Attitude" WWF, with their Howard Stern/Jerry Springer antics always going on. I don't think they had as much of a problem with the old school WWF, so they kinda let it go.
That was part of the problem, I know that much. Simply that they thought the WWF had gone too far in their "antics." I know approaches were made on that ground (Though I don't know how serious they were, how they were received, or how hard they pushed) before the deal ended and the lawsuit craziness began.

So it might make sense, it just seemed to me that the problems of "association" and "market confusion" wouldn't make any sense when differentiating between two logos with the same symbolism. Though if Pepsi Man is right, and they specifically cleared it, who am I to argue?

It may also be a timeframe issue.

I just thought it was a bit F'ed up.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote