|
Isn't what?
Isn't a good way of proving a point?
If you have an IQ bigger than your shoe size, you should be cabable of understanding that 1 point doesn't make a case.
Otherwise, I could now make the point that because of tha Abu Gahraib scandal, all US soldiers are Sadomassochists into rape and torture.
And at least that would have multiple incidents, instead of judging it off one guy who buttfucked a muslim.
You, OTOH, have pointed out one case which happens to favor your narrow point of view, which is forced to ignore all the reports those mainstream media types made about Clinton that were later debunked, the lack of favorable reporting for Gore or Kerry, or basically any knowledge or understanding of the media outside of a single incident.
If you take any single incident, you fail to prove anything. If you're trying to prove an overall bias, you need to try a little harder. I doubt you can, because it sounds like you've exhausted yourself with "Rathergate."
|