[Kane Knight]

Originally Posted by Crippler 666 Like ANY wrestling federation you have to give it time. TNA is young compared to some of the other federations.

If they last long enough. If they're going like this, they won't.

At least TNA has something that has been missing from the WWE for a long time now... Wrestling... the WWE stars only ever do about 12 moves at a main event... do the moves repeat... same moves week in week out (you can understand talent such as Batista who hasnt been wrestling as long as some) but Jericho, Benoit, Undertaker, Bradshaw, ETC

Except the Main eventers in TNA are just as Guilty. Jarrett's hardly the epitome of innovation.

Almost the whole roster has proved themselves on other federations... Just look at RVD vs Lynn How can you even say they are the same wrestlers?

They've proved themselves elsewhere...So what? That doesn't make TNA any better, it makes it worse for not using such talent.

How can anyone moan over storylines, wrestling ability and length of championship holder without first looking at the WWE? How crap was the Snitsky vs Kane plot? Angle vs Bradshaw vs Big Show (who didn't see the set up coming)? HHH vs Batista (who didn't know it was HHH setting him up)? The same people in the plots? The same storylines repeated?

Oop! You got us. There are some bad storylines in the WWE. That gives us no right to bitch about there being NO good storylines in TNA. Or even storylines period.

Now, were'(At least I'm not) claiming the WWE is great on storylines. I'm saying the WWE sucks, but TNA sucks more. In fact, I liked the Batista plot. Oh my God, I saw it coming! That's not because of the great build they gave it, hyping the tension between Triple H and Batista, no no no. It must be because the WWE SUXORZ!

Why when you have a large roster such as the WWE do we only have the same 4 or 5 people going for the title all year?

Again, what difference does it make if the smaller TNA is doing the same thing?

Why when the title does occasionally change hands does the old champion win it back at the next event (HHH mainly thou)?

But at least they've had Orton and Guerrero and Benoit AS Champions. Nobody's claiming the WWE is perfect, just that TNA is worse.

How can you moan over Jeff Jarret being the champ for so long when you have HHH (who is attached to the belt genetically) and Bradshaw (who was good at Tag Team but crap singles)?

And yet, Triple H has dropped the belt more than JJ. And since JBL will likely drop his title at WM, he'll be ahead of the game as well.

In other words, if all you're going to do is defend TNA by pretending we should give a shit because the WWE is crappy, please stop ignoring the fact that TNA is just as bad on many counts, worse on some, and doesn't really feature much of the excellent talent it has on the roster.

In other words, shut the fuck up until you have an argument that's a little less retarded.