Thread: Does raw have too many main eventers?
View Single Post
Old 03-08-2005, 02:35 PM   #6
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
NO, they don't have too many main eventers. The writers are just too fucking stupid to write plots more complicated than (X feuds with Y for ninth week in a row).

As someone mentioned recently, and I think it was CyNick, there was a time when there was more than one main event story arc going. It was done well, and even when one died down you had a few others already set up to carry you to the next PPV. Nowadays, blech. You could even make the title scene stronger by having a few of these main eventers chasing the WHT. You know, instead of waiting like 2 weeks before WM to pull Orton/Undertaker out of your ass.

Or, and this is gonna sound crazy, you can take a little less time to do Triple H's hour-long ego-wank, and add some more time for the other stars...
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote