Thread: How should Taker/Orton at Mania be booked? *Poss. Spoilers*
View Single Post
Old 03-10-2005, 12:00 PM   #39
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loose Cannon
Woah Woah, yea look at the two talents here. Cena and Taker. Cena = the future star of the WWE. Much like Austin when he came up, he NEEDS to be protected. Taker is almost of his way out. HE NEEDS to start doing jobs. Come on, I know you guys learned something from 2001-2003, where the guys like Austin, HHH, Taker and others should of done jobs to guys to elevate the new talent.

[....]

Point: Wrestlemania 13. Austin vs Bret Hart. Bret was a babyface going into the match, correct? What happened, Bret got the win, but kicked Austin when he was down and got tremendous heat for showing no respect. He didn't have a reason to turn heel other then he won and nobody seemed to appreciate it. Just like nobody seemed to care about Orton after he went after HHH. They turned to Batista and left Orton in the dust.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote