Thread: Is the WWE title still important or is it not?
View Single Post
Old 03-15-2005, 01:59 PM   #7
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
The only real value the champion belts have in wrestling is as a plot device for the wrestlers to strive to. It can create storylines, or augment them. It can spark feuds or be the end-all to them.

Now, the problem is that the "flagship" Show, Raw, has managed to kill most interest in the belt, making it a poor plot device, and kind of watering down the main event scene
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote