Thread: Does the WWE need a change?
View Single Post
Old 03-17-2005, 10:59 AM   #28
Kane Knight
Ron Paul 4 EVA
 
Kane Knight's Avatar
 
Posts: 152,467
Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)Kane Knight makes a lot of good posts (200,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOneLameGunn
More like you can't remember a time when Trips wasn't using it to get his belt back.
No, the rematch clause has been used by other people relatively recently.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheOneLameGunn
what a surprise, I leave TPDUB for a while. And when I come back... There is STILL a "what's wrong with the WWE" thread at the top of the main page
Selective timing.

Here, go away again, and see if it's any different.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Loose Cannon
If you think the WWE, HAS JUST STARTED TO BECOME STALE, where the hell have you been in the last 3 years?

In my opinion, this is the first time in 3 years that the WWE IS NOT STALE.
Let's be fair. Maybe he last saw it 4 years ago, so it DOES seem stale. I mean, it's on its way up, but that's from a pretty big low.
Kane Knight is offline   Reply With Quote