|
hmmm never really thought about reducing the number of PPVs but King of the Ring, that name has been soiled on by WWE because they made it way way too predictable and in the end it meant nothing.
Before it was an honor to be declared the king of the ring but like the last one there was it meant nothing to be the king. Sadly I wouldn't want the King of the Ring name soiled on anymore than it has been.
But 6 a year would give a lot more time to develop a story/feud. The only thing is will it work. I mean right now. Raw has their own special PPV that comes 2 months after their previous one as does SmackDown! and their problem is that after their PPV they do nothing. Then a month away is when they try to do everything. It isn't like they don't have time to develop the stories. Then a lotta time they don't. They just create some tournament to declare a number 1 contender. Then they start some random feud that goes nowhere, leads nowhere, and only bores the crowd.
Booker T vs. Hidenreich... Taker vs. Hidenreich. Who cares? Why? Both of those feuds were pointless.
The Batista/Triple H feud was good. That was because they built on that for a while.
XIX-Jericho vs. Shawn. That was an awesome feud that traced back to December.
The thing is there are guys like HHH and Shawn that get these awesome feuds then there are guys like Booker T that get nothing. There are guys like Haas that look like they are about to get this killer thing going on then out of the blue it gets shot down and they are stuck teamin with Hardcore Holly.
If anything WWE needs to resurrect feuds again. Not just create a match a week or two before the PPV show and have some short meaningless feud. Also it would be nice to have some of those feuds carry over the PPV.
|