[Bazooka]

Ultimate Warrior:

INTERNET, make angry, visit and post on forum, not know how, WHY WOULD ULTIMATE WARRIOR post on forum he good to much for. Tell no and sticks and stones might break bones but ULTIMATE WARRIOR ANGRY!! tell them I kill for word of rascist used to DESCRIBE ME!! Ultimate not like use of slander and will mutilate and strangle to death MR. SOMETHINGAWFUL. He mean and not like me, tell him all I said so he know and that he piss me OFF AND NOW TIME TO DIE!!

emails to Ultimate Warriors request:

FROM: Chris Lewis cl9904@msn.com TO: webmaster@somethingawful.com CC: mrwarrior@earthlink.net As Director of Communications for Ultimate Creations, Inc. - which owns all rights associated with the wrestling character Ultimate Warrior - part of my job is to address any violations of Ultimate Creations' intellectual property rights associated with the character. Consider this email as your fair notice that we consider your site to be in violation of those rights. A current posting on your site refers to the Ultimate Warrior as a "racist" - a statement that is not true, and is clearly libelous. Furthermore, Ultimate Creations, Inc. has never authorized you or anyone affiliated with your website to use the image or likeness of Ultimate Warrior. If the offending portion of your post is not removed by 9 AM on Monday, April 11, 2005, we will be forced to take appropriate legal action to address the libel and unauthorized use of the Ultimate Warrior likeness. We also expect an apology for your outrageous accusations against Warrior. Sincerely, Chris Lewis Director of Communications Ultimate Creations, Inc.

FROM: Chris Lewis cl9904@msn.com TO: webmaster@somethingawful.com CC: mrwarrior@earthlink.net Dear Mr. Kyanka, It's sad to see that your judgment is as poor as the quality of your site. You see, it is our position that you are taking the liberal position - claiming First Amendment protection for something that clearly goes beyond the scope of protected speech as envisioned by the Founding Fathers. The First Amendment should not and cannot be construed to defend violation of others' intellectual property rights or to libel them (which is the case here) or to offend others' sense of morality (which is the case with pornography, etc.). Your attack is so malicious and baseless that it is wholly without merit. Even when these violations come from someone as relatively inconsequential and unsuccessful as yourself, they must be addressed properly. I am not going to debate conservativism versus liberalism with you. I have put you on notice that you are libelling my client, and you have responded in a fashion that is evidence that you have received that notice and do not intend to comply with our simple requests. I was, however, somewhat amused by your offer of a forum to Warrior - like if he's going to make a public statement, it would be to you? Right. You've expressed your thoughts clearly. Just remember now - we gave you a fair chance to resolve this amicably. Sincerely, Chris Lewis Director of Communications