Thread: Do you think TNA could beat WWE in ratings someday?
View Single Post
Old 04-11-2005, 04:31 PM   #16
PureHatred
Instant Credibility
 
PureHatred's Avatar
 
Posts: 2,979
PureHatred has a great deal of rep (15,000+)PureHatred has a great deal of rep (15,000+)PureHatred has a great deal of rep (15,000+)PureHatred has a great deal of rep (15,000+)PureHatred has a great deal of rep (15,000+)PureHatred has a great deal of rep (15,000+)PureHatred has a great deal of rep (15,000+)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kane Knight
WCW wasn't in the same shape. IT was already established, and a semi viable company, not a struggling startup with the life expectency of JR's lunch
Both companies had shitty writing. Both companies were losing money, but seemed not to care because they had big companies bankrolling them. Both had shitty TV deals (remember, until September of 1995, WCW only had their Saturday Night TV show). And both were being killed by bookers who relied too much on guys that fanswere sick of seeing.

I know WCW was far more established and had more recognizable names. But I think there's a comparison to be made there.
PureHatred is offline   Reply With Quote